Encyclopedia Gravity Gravity Macroscopic Ledger Cyclic Shift Linear Map Smul
ARTICLE 2 claims 2 theorems
Gravity Macroscopic Ledger Cyclic Shift Linear Map Smul
A single theorem about how a recognition update scales with numbers is the hinge that lets a local rule extend to a whole system.
The shift's linearity
In quantum mechanics, states combine by addition and scale by complex numbers. A physical operation is called linear when it respects both moves: the result of acting on a sum is the sum of the results, and the result of acting on a scaled state is the scaled result. The theorem cyclicShiftLinear_map_smul proves the second half of that property for one specific operation, the recognition update, which is a fixed rule that advances a system's discrete record of events by one step.
The operation in question is the cyclic shift on an eight-tick signal carrier, a vector space with eight basis states. The theorem states that for any complex number c and any state ψ, shifting c·ψ gives the same result as c times the shifted ψ. In symbols: cyclicShiftLinear (c • ψ) = c • cyclicShiftLinear ψ. This scalar homogeneity, together with its additive counterpart, makes the shift a proper linear map rather than a merely formal rule.
Linearity matters because it is the bridge from one site to many. The framework builds a macroscopic ledger, a tensor product of many single-site carriers, and defines the macroscopic update as the shift applied factor by factor. The scalar property proved here is one of the five clauses in the certificate that the macroscopic update is a genuine linear extension. Without it, the whole construction would not qualify as a linear map, and the superposition principle for multi-site configurations would fail.
In Recognition Science, this theorem upgrades a paper claim to a structural theorem in the machine-checked library of formal theorems. It does not, however, identify the macroscopic update with any gravitational response operator; that physical identification remains an open target. The theorem is about the algebraic structure of the shift, not about what the shift means physically.
THEOREM cyclicShiftLinear_map_smul · IndisputableMonolith/Gravity/MacroscopicLedger.lean
theorem cyclicShiftLinear_map_smul (c : ℂ) (ψ : Signal8) :
cyclicShiftLinear (c • ψ) = c • cyclicShiftLinear ψ :=
cyclicShiftLinear.map_smul c ψ
THEOREM macroscopicLedgerTheorem · IndisputableMonolith/Gravity/MacroscopicLedger.lean
/-- The macroscopic ledger theorem is verified. -/
noncomputable def macroscopicLedgerTheorem
(ι : Type) [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι] :
MacroscopicLedgerTheorem ι where
single_site_linear ψ φ a b := by
rw [cyclicShiftLinear.map_add, cyclicShiftLinear.map_smul,
cyclicShiftLinear.map_smul]
tensor_action := MacroscopicShift_tprod
additive := MacroscopicShift_map_add
scalar_homogeneous := MacroscopicShift_map_smul
finite_superposition := MacroscopicShift_finite_sum
What this page does not claim
The theorem does not identify the macroscopic recognition update with any gravitational response operator. The theorem does not establish that the cyclic shift is the only possible recognition update. The theorem does not prove that the macroscopic ledger construction is physically realized.
Verify this page
Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:
$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Gravity/MacroscopicLedger.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)
A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.
Derived articles
This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:
- What physical interpretation does the framework assign to the cyclic shift on the eight-tick carrier?
- How does the macroscopic ledger construction relate to the gravitational channel response operator?
- What conditions would be needed to identify the macroscopic update with a gravitational effect?
MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND
THEOREM cyclicShiftLinear_map_smul · IndisputableMonolith/Gravity/MacroscopicLedger.lean
theorem cyclicShiftLinear_map_smul (c : ℂ) (ψ : Signal8) : cyclicShiftLinear (c • ψ) = c • cyclicShiftLinear ψ := cyclicShiftLinear.map_smul c ψThe theorem cyclicShiftLinear_map_smul proves that for any complex number c and any state ψ, shifting c·ψ gives the same result as c times the shifted ψ. cyclicShiftLinear_map_smul · IndisputableMonolith/Gravity/MacroscopicLedger.leanTHEOREM macroscopicLedgerTheorem · IndisputableMonolith/Gravity/MacroscopicLedger.lean
/-- The macroscopic ledger theorem is verified. -/ noncomputable def macroscopicLedgerTheorem (ι : Type) [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι] : MacroscopicLedgerTheorem ι where single_site_linear ψ φ a b := by rw [cyclicShiftLinear.map_add, cyclicShiftLinear.map_smul, cyclicShiftLinear.map_smul] tensor_action := MacroscopicShift_tprod additive := MacroscopicShift_map_add scalar_homogeneous := MacroscopicShift_map_smul finite_superposition := MacroscopicShift_finite_sumThe scalar property proved here is one of the five clauses in the certificate that the macroscopic update is a genuine linear extension. macroscopicLedgerTheorem · IndisputableMonolith/Gravity/MacroscopicLedger.lean