Encyclopedia Gravity Gravity Hawking Temperature From Rung T Hawking Eq Radius Form
ARTICLE 3 claims 2 theorems 1 model
Gravity Hawking Temperature From Rung T Hawking Eq Radius Form
The Hawking temperature of a black hole is usually written in terms of its mass; Recognition Science's theorem shows the same temperature follows from the horizon's radius alone.
The radius form
In classical general relativity, a Schwarzschild black hole of mass M has a Hawking temperature TH = ℏc³ / (8πGMkB). The temperature is lower for heavier holes. The same physics is often expressed through the Schwarzschild radius rs = 2M, the distance from the center to the event horizon, which gives the equivalent form TH = ℏc³ / (4πGkBrs). In units where ℏ = c = G = kB = 1, these collapse to TH(M) = 1/(8πM) and TH(rs) = 1/(4πrs).
The Recognition Science declaration T_hawking_eq_radius_form proves, for any positive mass M, that TH(M) = TH(2M), the temperature expressed through the radius equals the temperature expressed through the mass. This is a structural identity: it confirms the two descriptions are interchangeable, not independent. The same module also proves the temperature is always positive, that lighter holes are hotter, and that the Page time (the time for a hole to emit half its information) scales as the cube of the mass.
In Recognition Science, this identity is read through the framework's ledger picture: each unit of horizon area carries one recognition rung, the same counting that yields the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy SBH = A/4. The temperature is the inverse of the per-rung action quantum on the horizon lattice. One rung adds 2πrs of horizon circumference, and the temperature is the reciprocal of this perimeter modulo 4π. The framework models the temperature as a consequence of this discrete structure, not as a separate assumption.
The theorem does not derive the 8π factor from the framework's forcing chain. That factor comes from the standard semiclassical derivation (Hartle-Hawking 1976). The framework's contribution is the structural identity and the rung interpretation, conditional on the dimensional bridge from its native units to SI units, the same bridge that ties the Z boson mass to GeV. The prediction that a direct measurement of Hawking radiation would match the 1/(8πM) formula at the 10% level remains a hypothesis; no such measurement exists yet.
THEOREM T_hawking_eq_radius_form · IndisputableMonolith/Gravity/HawkingTemperatureFromRung.lean
/-- The Schwarzschild bridge: `T_hawking(M) = T_hawking_of_radius(2 M)`. -/
theorem T_hawking_eq_radius_form (M : ℝ) (hM : 0 < M) :
T_hawking M = T_hawking_of_radius (2 * M) := by
unfold T_hawking T_hawking_of_radius
have hM_ne : M ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt hM
have hpi : Real.pi ≠ 0 := Real.pi_ne_zero
field_simp
ring
THEOREM T_hawking_pos · mass_lt_implies_temp_gt · t_Page_def · IndisputableMonolith/Gravity/HawkingTemperatureFromRung.lean
theorem T_hawking_pos (M : ℝ) (hM : 0 < M) : 0 < T_hawking M := by
unfold T_hawking
apply div_pos one_pos
have hpi : 0 < Real.pi := Real.pi_pos
positivity
/-- Lighter holes are hotter. -/
theorem mass_lt_implies_temp_gt (M₁ M₂ : ℝ) (h₁ : 0 < M₁) (h₂ : 0 < M₂)
(hlt : M₁ < M₂) : T_hawking M₂ < T_hawking M₁ := by
unfold T_hawking
have hpi : 0 < Real.pi := Real.pi_pos
have h8pi : 0 < 8 * Real.pi := by positivity
have hd₁ : 0 < 8 * Real.pi * M₁ := mul_pos h8pi h₁
have hd₂ : 0 < 8 * Real.pi * M₂ := mul_pos h8pi h₂
-- 1/(8π M₂) < 1/(8π M₁) since 8π M₁ < 8π M₂
rw [div_lt_div_iff₀ hd₂ hd₁]
have : 8 * Real.pi * M₁ < 8 * Real.pi * M₂ :=
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left hlt h8pi
linarith
theorem t_Page_def (M : ℝ) :
t_Page M = 5120 * Real.pi * M ^ 3 := rfl
MODEL T_hawking · IndisputableMonolith/Gravity/HawkingTemperatureFromRung.lean
/-- Hawking temperature as a function of the Schwarzschild mass `M`
in RS-native units. -/
def T_hawking (M : ℝ) : ℝ := 1 / (8 * Real.pi * M)
What this page does not claim
The 8π factor in the denominator is derived from the framework's forcing chain. The theorem establishes the temperature formula in SI units without a dimensional bridge. A direct measurement of Hawking radiation has confirmed the 1/(8πM) prediction.
Verify this page
Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:
$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Gravity/HawkingTemperatureFromRung.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)
A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.
Derived articles
This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:
- How does the dimensional bridge from RS-native units to SI units work?
- What is the one-loop correction to the 8π factor that the framework predicts?
- How does the rung counting on the horizon lattice yield the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy?
- What would a laboratory measurement of Hawking radiation need to achieve to test the 10% prediction?
MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND
THEOREM T_hawking_eq_radius_form · IndisputableMonolith/Gravity/HawkingTemperatureFromRung.lean
/-- The Schwarzschild bridge: `T_hawking(M) = T_hawking_of_radius(2 M)`. -/ theorem T_hawking_eq_radius_form (M : ℝ) (hM : 0 < M) : T_hawking M = T_hawking_of_radius (2 * M) := by unfold T_hawking T_hawking_of_radius have hM_ne : M ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt hM have hpi : Real.pi ≠ 0 := Real.pi_ne_zero field_simp ringThe Recognition Science declaration T_hawking_eq_radius_form proves, for any positive mass M, that T_H(M) = T_H(2M), the temperature expressed through the radius equals the temperature expressed through the mass. T_hawking_eq_radius_form · IndisputableMonolith/Gravity/HawkingTemperatureFromRung.leanTHEOREM T_hawking_pos · mass_lt_implies_temp_gt · t_Page_def · IndisputableMonolith/Gravity/HawkingTemperatureFromRung.lean
theorem T_hawking_pos (M : ℝ) (hM : 0 < M) : 0 < T_hawking M := by unfold T_hawking apply div_pos one_pos have hpi : 0 < Real.pi := Real.pi_pos positivity/-- Lighter holes are hotter. -/ theorem mass_lt_implies_temp_gt (M₁ M₂ : ℝ) (h₁ : 0 < M₁) (h₂ : 0 < M₂) (hlt : M₁ < M₂) : T_hawking M₂ < T_hawking M₁ := by unfold T_hawking have hpi : 0 < Real.pi := Real.pi_pos have h8pi : 0 < 8 * Real.pi := by positivity have hd₁ : 0 < 8 * Real.pi * M₁ := mul_pos h8pi h₁ have hd₂ : 0 < 8 * Real.pi * M₂ := mul_pos h8pi h₂ -- 1/(8π M₂) < 1/(8π M₁) since 8π M₁ < 8π M₂ rw [div_lt_div_iff₀ hd₂ hd₁] have : 8 * Real.pi * M₁ < 8 * Real.pi * M₂ := mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left hlt h8pi linariththeorem t_Page_def (M : ℝ) : t_Page M = 5120 * Real.pi * M ^ 3 := rflThe same module also proves the temperature is always positive, that lighter holes are hotter, and that the Page time (the time for a hole to emit half its information) scales as the cube of the mass. T_hawking_pos · mass_lt_implies_temp_gt · t_Page_def · IndisputableMonolith/Gravity/HawkingTemperatureFromRung.leanMODEL T_hawking · IndisputableMonolith/Gravity/HawkingTemperatureFromRung.lean
/-- Hawking temperature as a function of the Schwarzschild mass `M` in RS-native units. -/ def T_hawking (M : ℝ) : ℝ := 1 / (8 * Real.pi * M)The framework models the temperature as a consequence of this discrete structure, not as a separate assumption. T_hawking · IndisputableMonolith/Gravity/HawkingTemperatureFromRung.lean