Encyclopedia Gravity Gravity Bhechoes Ligocatalog
ARTICLE 3 claims 2 theorems 1 model
Gravity Bhechoes Ligocatalog
A machine-checked library names four LIGO/Virgo merger events and proves that, in this framework, each should carry a faint gravitational-wave echo at a delay set by the golden ratio.
The echo catalog
Gravitational-wave echoes are a proposed repeat signal after the main burst from a black hole merger. In general relativity, the merged object settles silently; some alternatives to classical black holes predict a partial reflection that produces a fainter, delayed pulse. The LIGO and Virgo detectors have not yet confirmed such an echo in any event.
In Recognition Science, the framework models recognition events as a discrete ledger, a record of discrete happenings. Its geodesic-completeness theorem derives a bounce radius at each recognition rung rung, a step on the framework's ladder of scales, and an echo delay that grows with that radius. The module BHEchoesLIGOCatalog applies that prediction to four named merger events: GW150914, the first black hole merger detected; GW170817, the first neutron star merger; GW190521, an intermediate-mass merger; and GW230529, a neutron star black hole merger. For each, the framework predicts an echo at the bounce delay scaled by the source mass.
The module proves, in a machine-checked library of formal theorems, that the bounce radius is strictly positive at every rung and that the delay between adjacent rungs scales by the golden ratio φ. These are structural facts about the framework's own model, not measurements. The catalog also names a falsifier: a null result on a high-signal catalog event at rung N ≥ 1 would refute the framework's bounce mechanism.
The practical consequence is a concrete target for gravitational-wave searches. The framework does not claim an echo has been seen; it claims the prediction is precise enough to test. The delay formula, Δt(N) = 2 φ^(N/2) log φ, gives a specific number to look for in each event's data.
THEOREM bounceRadius_pos · IndisputableMonolith/Gravity/BHEchoesLIGOCatalog.lean
/-- Bounce radius is strictly positive at every rung. -/
theorem bounceRadius_pos (N : ℕ) : 0 < bounceRadius N := by
unfold bounceRadius
exact pow_pos Constants.phi_pos _
THEOREM echoDelay_succ_ratio · IndisputableMonolith/Gravity/BHEchoesLIGOCatalog.lean
/-- Adjacent-rung echo-delay ratio = φ. -/
theorem echoDelay_succ_ratio (N : ℕ) (hN : 1 ≤ N) :
echoDelay (N + 1) = echoDelay N * phi := by
unfold echoDelay
rw [bounceRadius_succ_ratio]
ring
MODEL BHEchoesCert · IndisputableMonolith/Gravity/BHEchoesLIGOCatalog.lean
structure BHEchoesCert where
bounce_radius_pos : ∀ N, 0 < bounceRadius N
bounce_radius_succ_ratio :
∀ N, bounceRadius (N + 1) = bounceRadius N * phi
echo_delay_pos : ∀ N, 1 ≤ N → 0 < echoDelay N
echo_delay_succ_ratio :
∀ N, 1 ≤ N → echoDelay (N + 1) = echoDelay N * phi
What this page does not claim
No gravitational-wave echo has been detected in any catalog event. The module does not prove that the framework's bounce mechanism is the correct explanation for any observed signal. The catalog's mass scaling is a definitional choice, not a derived prediction.
Verify this page
Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:
$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Gravity/BHEchoesLIGOCatalog.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)
A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.
Derived articles
This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:
- What would a null echo search on GW150914 imply for the framework's bounce mechanism?
- How does the predicted echo delay compare with the sensitivity of current LIGO/Virgo searches?
- What is the physical interpretation of the recognition rung N in a gravitational-wave signal?
MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND
THEOREM bounceRadius_pos · IndisputableMonolith/Gravity/BHEchoesLIGOCatalog.lean
/-- Bounce radius is strictly positive at every rung. -/ theorem bounceRadius_pos (N : ℕ) : 0 < bounceRadius N := by unfold bounceRadius exact pow_pos Constants.phi_pos _The module proves that the bounce radius is strictly positive at every rung. bounceRadius_pos · IndisputableMonolith/Gravity/BHEchoesLIGOCatalog.leanTHEOREM echoDelay_succ_ratio · IndisputableMonolith/Gravity/BHEchoesLIGOCatalog.lean
/-- Adjacent-rung echo-delay ratio = φ. -/ theorem echoDelay_succ_ratio (N : ℕ) (hN : 1 ≤ N) : echoDelay (N + 1) = echoDelay N * phi := by unfold echoDelay rw [bounceRadius_succ_ratio] ringThe module proves that the echo delay between adjacent rungs scales by the golden ratio φ. echoDelay_succ_ratio · IndisputableMonolith/Gravity/BHEchoesLIGOCatalog.leanMODEL BHEchoesCert · IndisputableMonolith/Gravity/BHEchoesLIGOCatalog.lean
structure BHEchoesCert where bounce_radius_pos : ∀ N, 0 < bounceRadius N bounce_radius_succ_ratio : ∀ N, bounceRadius (N + 1) = bounceRadius N * phi echo_delay_pos : ∀ N, 1 ≤ N → 0 < echoDelay N echo_delay_succ_ratio : ∀ N, 1 ≤ N → echoDelay (N + 1) = echoDelay N * phiThe catalog names four LIGO/Virgo merger events for which the bounce-echo prediction is structurally permitted. BHEchoesCert · IndisputableMonolith/Gravity/BHEchoesLIGOCatalog.lean