Gravity Analysis Regge Bloch Star Edge Origins M2 Eval4 Daudit Edge Origins M2 A

Audit scope

The declaration edge_origins_m2_audit_package is a machine-checked theorem in the framework's library of formal theorems. It bundles four separate evaluation results and one status check into a single package. The four evaluations, named for their roles in the analysis, each assert that a particular edge-origin computation holds. The fifth conjunct asserts that a status flag called gapActionRecovery equals false.

What does that mean in plain terms? The framework models reality as a discrete record of events called a ledger, a bookkeeping system where each recognition event is recorded. The audit package verifies that four specific edge-origin evaluations are true, meaning those computations check out formally. It also confirms that a particular recovery mechanism, the gap action recovery, is not active. That is the entire content: four true evaluations and one false flag.

The theorem's proof is axiom-clean. When the framework's proof checker audits the theorem, it finds only the three standard postulates of the ambient type theory: propositional extensionality, choice, and quotient soundness. No framework-specific axioms are needed. The audit's own documentation states this expected footprint explicitly.

What the package does not claim is just as precise. It does not say that the ledger S_RS is inhabited. It does not say that the gap action recovery mechanism works or is triggered. It does not establish any physical law or empirical prediction. It is purely a bookkeeping audit: four evaluation theorems hold, one flag is off, and the proof rests on standard postulates only.

theorem edge_origins_m2_audit_package :
    M2EdgeOriginsPlusSymbolDirEval ∧
      M2EdgeOriginsCrossSymbolDirEval ∧
        M2EdgeOriginsDecoyGaugeEval ∧
          M2EdgeOriginsCounterexM1100E2Eval ∧
            edgeOriginsM2EvalStatus.gapActionRecovery = false :=
  ⟨M2EdgeOriginsPlusSymbolDirEval_holds, M2EdgeOriginsCrossSymbolDirEval_holds,
    M2EdgeOriginsDecoyGaugeEval_holds, M2EdgeOriginsCounterexM1100E2Eval_holds, rfl⟩

theorem edge_origins_m2_audit_package :
    M2EdgeOriginsPlusSymbolDirEval ∧
      M2EdgeOriginsCrossSymbolDirEval ∧
        M2EdgeOriginsDecoyGaugeEval ∧
          M2EdgeOriginsCounterexM1100E2Eval ∧
            edgeOriginsM2EvalStatus.gapActionRecovery = false :=
  ⟨M2EdgeOriginsPlusSymbolDirEval_holds, M2EdgeOriginsCrossSymbolDirEval_holds,
    M2EdgeOriginsDecoyGaugeEval_holds, M2EdgeOriginsCounterexM1100E2Eval_holds, rfl⟩

theorem edge_origins_m2_audit_package :
    M2EdgeOriginsPlusSymbolDirEval ∧
      M2EdgeOriginsCrossSymbolDirEval ∧
        M2EdgeOriginsDecoyGaugeEval ∧
          M2EdgeOriginsCounterexM1100E2Eval ∧
            edgeOriginsM2EvalStatus.gapActionRecovery = false :=
  ⟨M2EdgeOriginsPlusSymbolDirEval_holds, M2EdgeOriginsCrossSymbolDirEval_holds,
    M2EdgeOriginsDecoyGaugeEval_holds, M2EdgeOriginsCounterexM1100E2Eval_holds, rfl⟩

What this page does not claim

The audit does not claim the ledger S_RS is inhabited. The audit does not claim the gap action recovery mechanism works or is triggered. The audit does not establish any physical law or empirical prediction.

Verify this page

Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:

$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Gravity/Analysis/ReggeBlochStarEdgeOriginsM2Eval4DAudit.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)

A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.

Derived articles

This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red: