Encyclopedia Foundation Foundation Gauge Symmetry3 From Jcost
ARTICLE 4 claims 3 theorems 1 open
Foundation Gauge Symmetry3 From Jcost
A machine-checked module proves three basic facts about a cost function, but the gauge symmetry it names remains a research note, not a result.
Gauge symmetry from cost
Gauge symmetry is a principle in physics where a theory's equations stay the same under certain transformations that change the description but not the physical state. In the standard model, the electromagnetic force arises from a U(1) gauge symmetry, and the weak force from a larger SU(2) x U(1) symmetry. The foundation gauge symmetry3 file in the framework's machine-checked library takes the J-cost function, a measure of recognition cost, and defines a new function on it.
The file defines domainCost as J(m/e), where m and e are real numbers. It then proves three general facts about this function: it equals zero when m and e are equal, it is never negative when both inputs are positive, and the number phi minus 3/2 is positive. These are all true for any positive real inputs, because they follow from the properties of J-cost itself. The file packages these three facts into a structure called RSGaugeSymm3Cert and shows that this structure is inhabited, meaning the facts are consistent.
The library's own documentation states clearly what this file does not do. It proves nothing specific to gauge symmetry, because domainCost is defined as J(m/e) without any reference to a physical system. The paragraph about U(1) sigma x U(1) Theta from Noether charges, and the photon as a diagonal subgroup, is a research note recording where the idea was meant to go, not a result. What would make this file a theorem about gauge symmetry is a definition of m and e in that subject's own terms.
In plain language, the file establishes that a certain cost function has three basic mathematical properties: it vanishes at equality, it is nonnegative, and a related threshold is positive. These are prerequisites, not the gauge symmetry itself. The gauge symmetry story remains open, awaiting a bridge that connects the abstract cost function to the concrete charges and groups of particle physics.
THEOREM domainCost_at_eq · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/GaugeSymmetry3_FromJCost.lean
theorem domainCost_at_eq (r : ℝ) (h : r ≠ 0) : domainCost r r = 0 := by
unfold domainCost; rw [div_self h]; exact Jcost_unit0
THEOREM domainCost_nonneg · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/GaugeSymmetry3_FromJCost.lean
theorem domainCost_nonneg (m e : ℝ) (hm : 0 < m) (he : 0 < e) : 0 ≤ domainCost m e := by
unfold domainCost; exact Jcost_nonneg (div_pos hm he)
THEOREM canonicalThreshold_pos · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/GaugeSymmetry3_FromJCost.lean
theorem canonicalThreshold_pos : 0 < canonicalThreshold := by
unfold canonicalThreshold; linarith [phi_gt_onePointFive]
What this page does not claim
This module does not prove that gauge symmetry exists or that U(1)_EM is the diagonal subgroup. The three proved facts are about a generic function and do not by themselves establish any particle physics. The research note about Noether charges is not a formal result.
Verify this page
Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:
$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/GaugeSymmetry3_FromJCost.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)
A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.
Derived articles
This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:
- What definitions of m and e in terms of Noether charges would make domainCost a theorem about gauge symmetry?
- How does the J-cost function relate to the U(1) and SU(2) symmetries of the standard model?
- What physical interpretation, if any, does the canonical threshold phi minus 3/2 carry?
MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND
THEOREM domainCost_at_eq · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/GaugeSymmetry3_FromJCost.lean
theorem domainCost_at_eq (r : ℝ) (h : r ≠ 0) : domainCost r r = 0 := by unfold domainCost; rw [div_self h]; exact Jcost_unit0The module proves that domainCost equals zero when m and e are equal. domainCost_at_eq · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/GaugeSymmetry3_FromJCost.leanTHEOREM domainCost_nonneg · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/GaugeSymmetry3_FromJCost.lean
theorem domainCost_nonneg (m e : ℝ) (hm : 0 < m) (he : 0 < e) : 0 ≤ domainCost m e := by unfold domainCost; exact Jcost_nonneg (div_pos hm he)The module proves that domainCost is never negative when both inputs are positive. domainCost_nonneg · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/GaugeSymmetry3_FromJCost.leanTHEOREM canonicalThreshold_pos · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/GaugeSymmetry3_FromJCost.lean
theorem canonicalThreshold_pos : 0 < canonicalThreshold := by unfold canonicalThreshold; linarith [phi_gt_onePointFive]The module proves that phi minus 3/2 is positive. canonicalThreshold_pos · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/GaugeSymmetry3_FromJCost.lean- OPENThe gauge symmetry story remains open, awaiting a bridge that connects the abstract cost function to the concrete charges and groups of particle physics.