Encyclopedia Condensed Condensed Matter Spin Glass Freezing Ratio Freezing Ratio2 D Band
ARTICLE 3 claims 2 theorems 1 hypothesis
Condensed Matter Spin Glass Freezing Ratio Freezing Ratio2 D Band
In a spin glass, the freezing temperature sits below the magnetic ordering temperature; the framework derives a specific ratio for that gap.
The 2D freezing ratio
A spin glass is a magnetic alloy, such as copper with a few percent of manganese, whose magnetic moments freeze into random directions rather than lining up. Its freezing temperature Tg is the point where those moments stop reorienting. A ferromagnet, by contrast, orders its moments into alignment at the Curie temperature Tc. The ratio Tg/Tc measures how far below the ordering temperature freezing happens. For a two-dimensional Ising spin glass, the Recognition Science framework derives that this ratio equals 1/φ², where φ is the golden ratio, approximately 1.618. That places the ratio near 0.382.
The declaration freezingRatio2D_band is a machine-checked theorem in the framework's library of formal theorems. It proves that 0.37 < 1/φ² < 0.40. The proof unfolds the definition of the ratio and uses known bounds on φ². This is a purely mathematical statement about the real number 1/φ². The framework also proves a companion theorem, dimensional_crossover, that the three-dimensional ratio 1/φ is exactly φ times the two-dimensional ratio 1/φ². The two ratios are not independent; they are linked by one factor of the golden ratio.
In Recognition Science, the framework models the freezing ratio as a consequence of its recognition lattice. The 2D Ising case realizes a deeper frustration than the 3D Heisenberg case, and that deeper frustration is expressed as the squared reciprocal of the golden ratio. The framework predicts that canonical 2D Ising spin glasses will have Tg/Tc in the band (0.37, 0.40). This is a prediction with a named falsifier: a survey of at least ten spin glasses with calibrated Tc values whose median falls outside (0.61, 0.62) for the 3D case would falsify the structural claim.
What the theorem does not claim is important. It does not prove that any real material has this ratio; that is an empirical question. The 3D band (0.617, 0.622) sits inside the measured CuMn and AuFe window of 0.60 to 0.65, but the 2D band has no measured counterpart in the pack. The theorem also does not derive the golden ratio itself; it assumes φ as a constant. The physical bridge, that a spin glass realizes the recognition lattice, is itself an open question in the framework.
THEOREM freezingRatio2D_band · IndisputableMonolith/CondensedMatter/SpinGlassFreezingRatio.lean
/-- Numerical band: `T_g / T_c ∈ (0.37, 0.40)` for 2D Ising. -/
theorem freezingRatio2D_band :
0.37 < freezingRatio2D ∧ freezingRatio2D < 0.40 := by
unfold freezingRatio2D
obtain ⟨h_phi2_lo, h_phi2_hi⟩ := phi_squared_bounds
have hpos : (0 : ℝ) < phi^2 := by linarith
have h_lo : (0.37 : ℝ) < 1 / phi^2 := by
rw [lt_div_iff₀ hpos]
nlinarith
have h_hi : (1 / phi^2 : ℝ) < 0.40 := by
rw [div_lt_iff₀ hpos]
nlinarith
exact ⟨h_lo, h_hi⟩
THEOREM dimensional_crossover · IndisputableMonolith/CondensedMatter/SpinGlassFreezingRatio.lean
/-- The 3D-to-2D ratio of freezing ratios is exactly φ. This is the
structural content of "going from 3D to 2D adds one φ-step of
frustration." -/
theorem dimensional_crossover :
freezingRatio3D = freezingRatio2D * phi := by
unfold freezingRatio3D freezingRatio2D
have hp : phi ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt phi_pos
field_simp
HYPOTHESIS spin_glass_one_statement · IndisputableMonolith/CondensedMatter/SpinGlassFreezingRatio.lean
/-- **SPIN-GLASS FREEZING ONE-STATEMENT.** Canonical 3D Heisenberg
spin glasses have `T_g / T_c = 1/φ ∈ (0.617, 0.622)`; canonical 2D
Ising spin glasses have `T_g / T_c = 1/φ² ∈ (0.37, 0.40)`; the
dimensional crossover from 2D to 3D adds exactly one φ-step. -/
theorem spin_glass_one_statement :
(0.617 < freezingRatio3D ∧ freezingRatio3D < 0.622) ∧
(0.37 < freezingRatio2D ∧ freezingRatio2D < 0.40) ∧
freezingRatio3D = freezingRatio2D * phi :=
⟨freezingRatio3D_band, freezingRatio2D_band, dimensional_crossover⟩
What this page does not claim
No measurement of a real 2D spin glass is cited in the pack. The theorem does not derive the value of the golden ratio itself. The physical identification of a spin glass with the recognition lattice is not proved.
Verify this page
Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:
$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/CondensedMatter/SpinGlassFreezingRatio.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)
A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.
Derived articles
This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:
- What measured 2D Ising spin-glass data would test the (0.37, 0.40) band?
- How does the framework define the recognition lattice for a disordered magnetic alloy?
- What physical mechanism in the framework explains why 2D frustration is deeper than 3D frustration?
MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND
THEOREM freezingRatio2D_band · IndisputableMonolith/CondensedMatter/SpinGlassFreezingRatio.lean
/-- Numerical band: `T_g / T_c ∈ (0.37, 0.40)` for 2D Ising. -/ theorem freezingRatio2D_band : 0.37 < freezingRatio2D ∧ freezingRatio2D < 0.40 := by unfold freezingRatio2D obtain ⟨h_phi2_lo, h_phi2_hi⟩ := phi_squared_bounds have hpos : (0 : ℝ) < phi^2 := by linarith have h_lo : (0.37 : ℝ) < 1 / phi^2 := by rw [lt_div_iff₀ hpos] nlinarith have h_hi : (1 / phi^2 : ℝ) < 0.40 := by rw [div_lt_iff₀ hpos] nlinarith exact ⟨h_lo, h_hi⟩It proves that 0.37 < 1/φ² < 0.40. freezingRatio2D_band · IndisputableMonolith/CondensedMatter/SpinGlassFreezingRatio.leanTHEOREM dimensional_crossover · IndisputableMonolith/CondensedMatter/SpinGlassFreezingRatio.lean
/-- The 3D-to-2D ratio of freezing ratios is exactly φ. This is the structural content of "going from 3D to 2D adds one φ-step of frustration." -/ theorem dimensional_crossover : freezingRatio3D = freezingRatio2D * phi := by unfold freezingRatio3D freezingRatio2D have hp : phi ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt phi_pos field_simpThe framework also proves a companion theorem, dimensional_crossover, that the three-dimensional ratio 1/φ is exactly φ times the two-dimensional ratio 1/φ². dimensional_crossover · IndisputableMonolith/CondensedMatter/SpinGlassFreezingRatio.leanHYPOTHESIS spin_glass_one_statement · IndisputableMonolith/CondensedMatter/SpinGlassFreezingRatio.lean
/-- **SPIN-GLASS FREEZING ONE-STATEMENT.** Canonical 3D Heisenberg spin glasses have `T_g / T_c = 1/φ ∈ (0.617, 0.622)`; canonical 2D Ising spin glasses have `T_g / T_c = 1/φ² ∈ (0.37, 0.40)`; the dimensional crossover from 2D to 3D adds exactly one φ-step. -/ theorem spin_glass_one_statement : (0.617 < freezingRatio3D ∧ freezingRatio3D < 0.622) ∧ (0.37 < freezingRatio2D ∧ freezingRatio2D < 0.40) ∧ freezingRatio3D = freezingRatio2D * phi := ⟨freezingRatio3D_band, freezingRatio2D_band, dimensional_crossover⟩The framework predicts that canonical 2D Ising spin glasses will have Tg/Tc in the band (0.37, 0.40). spin_glass_one_statement · IndisputableMonolith/CondensedMatter/SpinGlassFreezingRatio.lean